To Blast......or not to Blast......that is my question... - TCCoA Forums
View Poll Results: To Blast.....or.....To Dip.....
Sand/ Media Blast 2 50.00%
Chemical Dip 2 50.00%
Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-31-2005, 03:35 PM Thread Starter
PostWhore
 
joshbea6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Age: 45
Posts: 1,601
Send a message via AIM to joshbea6
To Blast......or not to Blast......that is my question...

I need some assistance on this decision and need opinions/ rationale for why you suggest the option that you do.

I have a 1990 SC 5spd that is my baby. She suffers from some underbody rust which claimed the floorpan and front IRS mounts to name a few.

I currently have about 85% of the car stripped out, ie. engine/ K-Member removed, interior removed, IRS removed, bumper covers/ GFX removed, etc.

What I want to know is should I get it chemically dipped, or just have it sand/ media blasted?

Please give your reasoning for your choice.

Thanks.

P.S. To get the car dipped or to get it blasted completely is going to cost about the same, so it is really a matter of which to do.

1997 LX Sport 4.6L 2.73 , MODS=SCT tuned/J-Mod/Trans Cooler/Dyno max Cat-Back/NgkPlugs/Mac cold air/March UD's/FRPP aluminumcarrier3.73's(spare for strip use)/ PI cams + PI intake manifold w/adapter plate/ Mark VIII Convertor/80mm L-Maf/70mm TB/ Mark VIII 1 piece shaft/Cobra R' wheels/ Kumhos 235/60/16 - White leather w/ blue cloth seats - white face gauges in 95 cluster
joshbea6 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-31-2005, 03:53 PM
The Parts Guy
 
racecougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Imperial, Missouri (near St. L
Age: 36
Posts: 7,265
I personally don't have any experience with chemical dipping, but I do have a LOT of experience with mediablasting cars. Both methods have their own pros and cons. I would choose media blasting, simply because I am more familiar with it.

-Rod

Rod @ AzzKicker Cars
[email protected]
90 XR7-The Meth Addict-KB SC'd 5.0L DOHC Stroker
2004 Mustang GT-The Driver-Intake/Exhaust/3.73's
1995 F150 4x4-The Mud Toy-5.0L/4R70W/33's/Warn 8274 Winch
94 LX w/Splitport 3.8L from 2000 Mustang - SOLD
2 - 90 35th Anny Ed SC's
And a TON of parts cars!
racecougar is offline  
post #3 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-31-2005, 06:25 PM Thread Starter
PostWhore
 
joshbea6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Age: 45
Posts: 1,601
Send a message via AIM to joshbea6
The only problem that I have with media blasting is that there will be pockets of media that they won't be able to get out of the car. Where with the chemical bath, you can wash away, or dilute the hell out of the chemicals where it sits in seams and corners.

Only problem I have with the chemical dip is that I've never done it before either. I've had plenty of experience with sand/ media blasting, and I know the pro's and con's of it.

1997 LX Sport 4.6L 2.73 , MODS=SCT tuned/J-Mod/Trans Cooler/Dyno max Cat-Back/NgkPlugs/Mac cold air/March UD's/FRPP aluminumcarrier3.73's(spare for strip use)/ PI cams + PI intake manifold w/adapter plate/ Mark VIII Convertor/80mm L-Maf/70mm TB/ Mark VIII 1 piece shaft/Cobra R' wheels/ Kumhos 235/60/16 - White leather w/ blue cloth seats - white face gauges in 95 cluster
joshbea6 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-31-2005, 07:38 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,890
Id personally go with the blasting. Ive done this before with engine parts and really liked the results. The chemical dip is very effective to. Hot tanked a few front end parts and turned out great also. I guess it just comes down to price, but since they are both about the same, whatever you choose will give good results. I just prefer the sand blasting because you know exactly what is coming out the end.

Last edited by Blue LS; 02-04-2005 at 06:43 PM.
Blue LS is offline  
post #5 of 10 (permalink) Old 02-01-2005, 12:56 AM
4th Gear Poster
 
1WLD BRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dunnville, Ontario, Canada
Age: 40
Posts: 242
Send a message via AIM to 1WLD BRD
I would probably choose the dip, because you don't really have to worry about the guy that does the blasting, screwing up and warpping one of the many large panels on these cars. And like josh said, you can rinse out damn near all traces of the chemical.

My Cougar Domain
XBox Live: cn1WLD BRD
1WLD BRD is offline  
post #6 of 10 (permalink) Old 02-01-2005, 10:48 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,565
Just curious for the future, how much (approximately, of course) would it cost to have the entire car blasted?
SloMo228 is offline  
post #7 of 10 (permalink) Old 02-01-2005, 10:50 PM Thread Starter
PostWhore
 
joshbea6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Age: 45
Posts: 1,601
Send a message via AIM to joshbea6
Depending on the place you go to........

I was quoted the price of $1200 for blasting the ENTIRE car....inside and out of EVERY pannel.

1997 LX Sport 4.6L 2.73 , MODS=SCT tuned/J-Mod/Trans Cooler/Dyno max Cat-Back/NgkPlugs/Mac cold air/March UD's/FRPP aluminumcarrier3.73's(spare for strip use)/ PI cams + PI intake manifold w/adapter plate/ Mark VIII Convertor/80mm L-Maf/70mm TB/ Mark VIII 1 piece shaft/Cobra R' wheels/ Kumhos 235/60/16 - White leather w/ blue cloth seats - white face gauges in 95 cluster
joshbea6 is offline  
post #8 of 10 (permalink) Old 02-04-2005, 03:47 PM Thread Starter
PostWhore
 
joshbea6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Age: 45
Posts: 1,601
Send a message via AIM to joshbea6
ttt

I really would appreciate more feedback with this one.

1997 LX Sport 4.6L 2.73 , MODS=SCT tuned/J-Mod/Trans Cooler/Dyno max Cat-Back/NgkPlugs/Mac cold air/March UD's/FRPP aluminumcarrier3.73's(spare for strip use)/ PI cams + PI intake manifold w/adapter plate/ Mark VIII Convertor/80mm L-Maf/70mm TB/ Mark VIII 1 piece shaft/Cobra R' wheels/ Kumhos 235/60/16 - White leather w/ blue cloth seats - white face gauges in 95 cluster
joshbea6 is offline  
post #9 of 10 (permalink) Old 02-04-2005, 03:54 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,890
1200 for blasting everything sounds like a good deal. Id say go for it.
Blue LS is offline  
post #10 of 10 (permalink) Old 02-04-2005, 06:12 PM
Seasoned PostWhore
 
jk69cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: vernon hills, IL
Age: 42
Posts: 5,978
do media ! no sand! sand will beat the hell out the metal and it will make the sheet metal wavy .

64 ford galaxie -FE powered beast!- sleeping giant
69 cougar standard- 347/c6 -efi restomod, heidts prog 4 link heavily modified front, custom strutrods boxed lowers rollerperches 620 lowering springs! meier shock tower brace
96 f150 supercab lifted beast! 351 powered beast
87 shasta roadmaster 29ft travel trailer- pimpdaddy camping!
mn12 less!
jk69cat is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TCCoA Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome