Mark and MN12 front suspension differences - TCCoA Forums
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 10 (permalink) Old 04-23-2012, 01:54 PM Thread Starter
Rob
Seasoned PostWhore
 
Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hubbard, TX
Age: 37
Posts: 3,902
Send a message via AIM to Rob
Mark and MN12 front suspension differences

Why do the front lower control arms on a Mark have a different part number than the thunderbird? Whats the difference? I know the uppers have the tab for the level sensor, but what is different about the lower arm? Arent the uppers the same as far as shape goes? Thanks in advance!

-Rob
RIP '94 Amber Fire Pearl Metallic Thunderbird on Bullitts 14.56[email protected]
96 Sport '02 Explorer PI with ported heads, 90MM LMAF, DirtyDog Marauder TC, Lasota tune, Jmod, Magnaflow mid-mount with X, no cats. Urethane drivers motor mount. HIDs!
Rob is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 10 (permalink) Old 04-23-2012, 02:03 PM
Seasoned PostWhore
Super Moderator
 
theterminator93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Ridgeville, Ohio
Age: 31
Posts: 9,082
Garage
The only difference I'm aware of on the fronts is a small cup washer at the frame connection when the FN10 LCAs don't have it. And the ride height sensor tab is the only difference on the uppers.

The LCAs and UCAs are exactly the same otherwise.

-Brandon
97 Laser Red Thunderbird LX 162k, Stage 2 4.6L 2v N/A | 300 BHP (255 RWHP, 290 RWTQ) | 13.95 @ 97.58 | Build details | Pics at the Lorain Assembly plant
98 Black Mark VIII 160k, stock daily driver
07 Redfire Fusion V6 SEL 178k, for the wife
Gone but not forgotten: 96 Mark VIII, 94 Cougar XR7, 93 Mark VIII

TCCoA's resident pilot since 2014
Once you have tasted flight, you will walk the world with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been and there you long to return. -Leonardo da Vinci
theterminator93 is offline  
post #3 of 10 (permalink) Old 04-23-2012, 03:34 PM
DLF
6th Gear Poster
 
DLF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Forked River, NJ
Age: 65
Posts: 570
Bushing durometer and the Lincoln tax.

98 Toreador Red Mark VIII LSC - 13.221 @ 104.91
95 Pearl White Thunderbird SC 5spd - 12.879 @ 106.66
98 Laser Red/Black Cobra Coupe (T-56/IRS) - 12.483 @ 110.94
My Web Site
Delrin IRS Bushing Kits - UHMW Spring Perches - SS Steering Joints
DLF is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 10 (permalink) Old 04-23-2012, 05:47 PM
Seasoned PostWhore
 
NetKeym's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by theterminator93 View Post
The only difference I'm aware of on the fronts is a small cup washer at the frame connection when the FN10 LCAs don't have it. And the ride height sensor tab is the only difference on the uppers.

The LCAs and UCAs are exactly the same otherwise.
My upper ball joint was worn out on my FN10 and I swapped in the MN12 good UCA I had. I converted to springs anyhow, so I didn't need that stupid little air bag height sensor.

I also swapped the LCA from the MN12 into the FN10 and didn't even notice they were different at all.

~Rick

TCCoA Sig
NetKeym is offline  
post #5 of 10 (permalink) Old 04-23-2012, 06:54 PM
PostWhore
 
driller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 1,267
Send a message via AIM to driller
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLF View Post
Bushing durometer and the Lincoln tax.
I knew about the Lincoln tax but didn't know the bushing durometer was different.
driller is offline  
post #6 of 10 (permalink) Old 04-23-2012, 07:15 PM
6th Gear Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Age: 32
Posts: 652
Quote:
Originally Posted by driller View Post
I the bushing durometer was different.
?? what is that??

97 LX
Motor and trans from 95
Working out the bugs right now.

R.I.P.
1995 Thunderbird LX. Black
BEST MOTOR TIMES
12.76 @ 105
BEST NITROUS
12.12 @ 109 mph
Stuckinkaos07 is offline  
post #7 of 10 (permalink) Old 04-23-2012, 08:36 PM
PostWhore
 
driller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 1,267
Send a message via AIM to driller
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuckinkaos07 View Post
?? what is that??
Durometer is a "hardness" measurement of rubber components.
driller is offline  
post #8 of 10 (permalink) Old 04-23-2012, 09:10 PM
pendejo
 
druggles85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Exeter, N.H.
Age: 34
Posts: 430
I think it's funny that the arms with the softer bushings cost so much more... Well not HA HA funny...

"Yesterday, upon the stair,
I met a man who wasn't there.
He wasn't there again today,
I wish, I wish he'd go away..."
druggles85 is offline  
post #9 of 10 (permalink) Old 04-23-2012, 09:50 PM
Seasoned PostWhore
 
NetKeym's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by druggles85 View Post
I think it's funny that the arms with the softer bushings cost so much more... Well not HA HA funny...
So what y'all are saying is that since I put a Sport TBird LCA on the driver's side of my Mark VIII, but have the original LCA on the other size that one side with be harder & stiffer?

Say it ain't so! Well, at least the stiffer side is the side I have my fat a** in!

~Rick

TCCoA Sig
NetKeym is offline  
post #10 of 10 (permalink) Old 04-23-2012, 10:52 PM
Seasoned PostWhore
 
Earl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Katy TX
Age: 37
Posts: 6,111
For the most part, the prefix and potentially the suffix will always be different because of desinating application on the prefix and either a revision, color, or some other detail on the suffix, the middle, the basic part number, will typically be the same between ALL FLM vehicles...example, a 96 bird will be an F6SZ is a 96 bird and typically a 96 Lincoln would be F6VZ...then the basic part number, like an 1130 would be a wheel cover and then, say A as a suffix would typically denote something like it is the original version, AA or AB might be a second revision, etc. So say, F6SZ-1130-A = 96 bird wheel cover F6VZ-1130-a = the same thing for a lincoln application, IIRC F6TZ would be a truck, and so on and so on

in the case of the mark arm vs the bird, there are differences, sometimes there may not be a difference, it might be an identical part, with a different part number, and a different price, although many things really are model specific, even if they look the same physically, and do the same thing, bird/mark/ranger/mustang/etc. cruise switches are a very good example of this.

Of course starting in 1999 or so, ford switched up their part numbering system, in the prefix area and now there is this whole other thing going on, for the sake of international business, world cars, etc. It all still has meaning it's just different now. Henry Ford really was a genious to come up with the part numbering system he came up with, compared to the other manufacturers...GM and chryslter and ALL the imports all use very similar, very hard to understand part numbering systems, ford is very, very, very straight forward and easy. Remembering basic number groups and what they all are is really the only difficult part of that.

2015 Mustang GT Premium / Manual / 3.55 / Recaro
Earl is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TCCoA Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome