Super Coupe supercharger on a Mustang? - TCCoA Forums
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 10 (permalink) Old 12-29-2004, 06:48 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 18
Super Coupe supercharger on a Mustang?

I know it's not exactly a Tbird/cougar question, but what would be invovled in making a Super Coupe supercharger work with a 1999 Mustang 3.8L V6?
pdekraker is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 10 (permalink) Old 12-29-2004, 08:04 PM
The Parts Guy
 
racecougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Imperial, Missouri (near St. L
Age: 36
Posts: 7,265
At the moment, nobody (that I know of) is selling intakes that will mate the M-90 to the splitport heads. So basically, you'd have to swap the 99+ splitport heads for a pair of singleports and use the SC lower intake. And that brings it right back to the issue of durability, which comes up in a question about once a week. The M-90 is not the best choice in superchargers for a 3.8L N/A shortblock. If you need more info about that topic, there is plenty in this forum.

-Rod

Rod @ AzzKicker Cars
[email protected]
90 XR7-The Meth Addict-KB SC'd 5.0L DOHC Stroker
2004 Mustang GT-The Driver-Intake/Exhaust/3.73's
1995 F150 4x4-The Mud Toy-5.0L/4R70W/33's/Warn 8274 Winch
94 LX w/Splitport 3.8L from 2000 Mustang - SOLD
2 - 90 35th Anny Ed SC's
And a TON of parts cars!
racecougar is offline  
post #3 of 10 (permalink) Old 12-29-2004, 11:41 PM
Moderator
Iowa Chapter Director
Uber Luber
TCCoAAC Member
Moderator
 
Thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ames, Iowa
Age: 35
Posts: 8,978
You'll have to contact v6sprout on v6power.net He's making a lower intake manifold that works for the split-port heads, but he's adapting an 03 cobra blower to it. If he were willing to make one for you, I'm positive it would be very expensive, and take a lot of time, as he hasnt even got his own intake done yet. But it is being done by someone.
-Thomas

1988 Notch Mustang: - 438W, direct port n2o, t56
2003 SVT Focus: - SCT X3 tuner
Thomas is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 10 (permalink) Old 12-30-2004, 12:31 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 241
seriously tho... i think we should have a sticky thread at the top that says why slapping an M90 on the top of an NA 3.8 is a bad idea.
brokenmachines_e2 is offline  
post #5 of 10 (permalink) Old 12-30-2004, 12:41 AM
The Parts Guy
 
racecougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Imperial, Missouri (near St. L
Age: 36
Posts: 7,265


Or even just a thread that says, "before you ask about installing a Eaton M-90 on a 3.8L N/A engine, SEARCH".

This isn't guided toward you at all, pdekraker, it's just that this question comes up almost every week. You were at least asking about doing it to a splitport.

-Rod

Rod @ AzzKicker Cars
[email protected]
90 XR7-The Meth Addict-KB SC'd 5.0L DOHC Stroker
2004 Mustang GT-The Driver-Intake/Exhaust/3.73's
1995 F150 4x4-The Mud Toy-5.0L/4R70W/33's/Warn 8274 Winch
94 LX w/Splitport 3.8L from 2000 Mustang - SOLD
2 - 90 35th Anny Ed SC's
And a TON of parts cars!
racecougar is offline  
post #6 of 10 (permalink) Old 12-30-2004, 08:35 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 241
Yes... Its not a matter of annoyance, really. Its more of a matter of convenience to newbies who dont know the answer to the question, and dont have to hear about how stupid they are for not using the search function.
brokenmachines_e2 is offline  
post #7 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-01-2005, 03:58 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 18
Yeah, I know a lot has been said about putting an M90 on a N/A 3.8, and I know there are lots of good reason not to do it to the Tbird 3.8's, but I wasn't sure if the 3.8's in the 1999 Mustang are different, and hence might not have the same problems. Thanks for the tip about v6power.net, I'll go check it out.
pdekraker is offline  
post #8 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-01-2005, 04:23 PM
Moderator
Iowa Chapter Director
Uber Luber
TCCoAAC Member
Moderator
 
Thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ames, Iowa
Age: 35
Posts: 8,978
well the m90 would be way easier to retro fit to a single-port 3.8 na than a split-port 3.8 na.

1988 Notch Mustang: - 438W, direct port n2o, t56
2003 SVT Focus: - SCT X3 tuner
Thomas is offline  
post #9 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-01-2005, 05:52 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 241
Well... maybe. Doesnt the Split Port already have DIS? It really depends on whether or not you like wiring or doing a head swap.
brokenmachines_e2 is offline  
post #10 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-01-2005, 11:00 PM
Moderator
Iowa Chapter Director
Uber Luber
TCCoAAC Member
Moderator
 
Thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ames, Iowa
Age: 35
Posts: 8,978
why downgrade to single-port heads unless they're machined for larger valves? The split-port heads have a larger intake valve, at 1.9" diameter. Thats larger than my big valve heads at 1.84" If it were me, I'd look for other ways of power adding, such as a turbo setup. You could find a used t3 at a junkyard.

Yeah it has DIS, but you'd need to use a supercoupe computer anyways, so that's kind of null and void to the situation.

-Thomas

1988 Notch Mustang: - 438W, direct port n2o, t56
2003 SVT Focus: - SCT X3 tuner
Thomas is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TCCoA Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome