anyone swap a late model Mustang 3.8L into a T-Bird? - TCCoA Forums
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 6 (permalink) Old 12-14-2002, 09:19 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 76
anyone swap a late model Mustang 3.8L into a T-Bird?

was just curious on the feasability of this. The later model Mustang 3.8's belt out decent hp and torque while still retaining respectable fuel efficiency.

Has anyone tried this?
edgar is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 6 (permalink) Old 12-14-2002, 09:24 PM
MA Chapter Director

Administrator
 
Rodeo Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Franklin, MA
Age: 63
Posts: 7,967
Garage
PJ 4.2L has swapped in a 4.2 into his. I've heard people doing the head swap (I'm going to try it this Spring) but not the entire engine.

Joe

It's not a 97 Sport, it just looks like one!

Mass. TCCoAers, Send me your info!

I buy all my Ford parts from 93 lx.

Member of the TCCoA Damage Control Team.

R.I.P. Johnny Langton 1975 - 2011
Rodeo Joe is offline  
post #3 of 6 (permalink) Old 12-15-2002, 11:58 AM
PostWhore
 
PJ-4.2L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Westlake Village, CA
Age: 39
Posts: 1,013
Send a message via AIM to PJ-4.2L
edgar, welcome.

Most of us prefer to think about the 4.2 swap IF we are swapping entire engines. The later Mustang 3.8 only puts out more power because of the heads and intake. Most of the time, these items can be obtained cheaper than the whole engine. If you absolutely want an entire engine, you can try to find a 4.2 F-150 engine.

If you can get a late Mustang 3.8 (we call it the split port 3.8 or sp 3.8) for really cheap, then rest assured that there isn't much that can go wrong. It's one of the easiest swaps you can do. Depending on your year, the most you have to worry about is your ignition system.

PJ

PJ- 4.2L -
" 'DIY' was not meant for women."
PJ-4.2L is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 6 (permalink) Old 12-21-2002, 11:03 PM
5th Gear Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ottawa,OH
Age: 39
Posts: 377
Send a message via AIM to rzimmerl
is there any difference in flow between a 98 mustang upper and my 93 upper came across a cheap one on ebay and was wondering is if worth the money or just ot polish mine, or if the mustang is better polish it

1990 SC AOD 1.7L AR....11.75 @118
441 RWHP 435 RWTQ
rzimmerl is offline  
post #5 of 6 (permalink) Old 12-22-2002, 08:52 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,921
there is NO difference in the 98 upper intake, the LOWER is slightly better on the 96+ cars but you need to drill out the intake bolt holes a bit bigger to fit your stock intake bolts.
rancherlee is offline  
post #6 of 6 (permalink) Old 01-03-2003, 11:44 AM
The Parts Guy
 
racecougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Imperial, Missouri (near St. L
Age: 36
Posts: 7,265
Here's the thread to my swap. I swaped a 2000 engine into my 94 Bird, installed DIS, etc, etc, etc. http://forums.tccoa.com/showthread.p...threadid=10412

Rod @ AzzKicker Cars
[email protected]
90 XR7-The Meth Addict-KB SC'd 5.0L DOHC Stroker
2004 Mustang GT-The Driver-Intake/Exhaust/3.73's
1995 F150 4x4-The Mud Toy-5.0L/4R70W/33's/Warn 8274 Winch
94 LX w/Splitport 3.8L from 2000 Mustang - SOLD
2 - 90 35th Anny Ed SC's
And a TON of parts cars!
racecougar is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TCCoA Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome